“I don’t understand
why [the sex before] would be relevant to anything, let alone mitigating it,”
said Brett Sokolow. “Look at marital rape. No matter how many times they’ve had
consensual sex, the one time he rapes her it’s still rape. Why would you treat
this any differently?”
Friday, September 5, 2014
Thursday, September 4, 2014
A Summary of NCHERM Group Leadership and Innovation since 1997
Various media outlets
and interest groups have recently presented a narrow view of The NCHERM Group’s
activities. We thought we would take this opportunity to review some of our
contributions and accomplishments over the last seventeen years in order to offer
a broader perspective.
The Chronicle of Higher Education quotes Sokolow in "Presumed Guilty"
But the crackdown, say young men and their
lawyers, has come at a cost. Since the Education Department issued a "Dear
Colleague" letter in 2011, admonishing colleges to process students’
reports of assault uniformly—with the goals of investigating all cases and
preventing new ones—many campus officials believe the underlying message is
that they should side with victims, says Brett A. Sokolow, president of the
National Center for Higher Education Risk Management, a consulting and law
firm. The department’s letter also emphasized that colleges should determine
responsibility using the "more likely than not" standard of proof.
That’s lower than the "beyond a reasonable doubt" standard required for
a criminal conviction.
In the past few months, Mr. Sokolow says he
has gotten nearly 60 calls from accused students and their parents—a steep rise
from just a year ago. He takes the cases he feels are the strongest (for now, a
dozen). "The last thing I want to do," he says, "is represent a
rapist."
Of the cases Mr. Sokolow has accepted, at
various stages of resolution, three young men have had charges against them
dismissed following campus investigations or hearings. Three others whose
colleges had found them responsible had those findings reversed on appeal, and
two who were found responsible reached settlements with their institutions. The
rest of the cases are pending.
The problem with that reasoning, say
lawyers representing those accused, is that colleges often apply it in cases in
which both parties were drunk but not incapacitated. "If the university
poorly distinguishes between being merely intoxicated and being
incapacitated—and many do—it’s discriminatory to charge only the man,"
says Mr. Sokolow. But that is what often happens, he says.
Wednesday, September 3, 2014
Minnesota Daily quotes Sokolow on University of Minnesota case
Brett Sokolow,
president of the National Center for Higher Education Risk Management, said
recommending counseling is generally a mild response to retaliation, but
appropriate remedial measures vary by case.
Huffington Post quotes Sokolow on University of Kansas sanction
Brett Sokolow,
president and CEO of the National Center for Higher Education Risk Management,
who frequently counsels schools on how to handle incidents of sexual assault,
said that applying such a sanction in this case did not appear appropriate.
The KU case shows why
leaving these matters in the hands of student conduct administrators who lack
training in the complexities of sexual violence -- rather than in the hands of
a Title IX coordinator -- is a bad idea, Sokolow said.
"They want
desperately to believe they can use a reflection paper to teach him to stop
next time," Sokolow said. "They don't think about the next victim, if
he does not stop."
Tuesday, September 2, 2014
Lewis and Sokolow quoted in The Daily Camera’s “CU-Boulder defends motives in handling of sexual misconduct cases”
Much of the renewed
interest around Title IX can be attributed to more guidance from the U.S.
Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights and communication from the
White House about campus sexual assaults, said Scott Lewis, a founder of the
Association of Title IX administrators.
Lewis, who's also a
partner with the National Center for Higher Education Risk Management, has
helped train thousands of college and university investigators.
Schools have been
criticized in recent years for not doing enough to make victims of sexual
misconduct feel safe on campus and for questioning victims' character, sexual
behavior and drinking habits, among other things, Lewis said.
It's possible that
some schools are overcorrecting now for past mistakes, he said.
"For a long time,
the pendulum was swung very heavily to the due process rights of the accused,
at the expense of the victim at times," Lewis said. "So as the
pendulum begins to come back to the middle, and we have good impartial
decisions made by investigators, there are some schools that have swung that
pendulum a little far."
In an April 2014
newsletter, Brett Sokolow, executive director of the Association of Title IX
Administrators, described his recent involvement in five cases where he
believed universities mistakenly found men guilty of sexual misconduct when
alcohol was involved.
"Finding each of
the accused in violation of sexual misconduct is sex discrimination," he
wrote. "We are making Title IX plaintiffs out of them."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)